When we think about future possibilities of intercontinental or
interstellar travel we always face the same issue. Fuel tanks limit or
range and fuel types, fossilized or any other kind, limit speed.
Theoretically a non stop flight around the world is possible for the
average man to accomplish in 80 - 100 hours.
A trip to the next closest star would take 70.000 years with the fastest rockets available.
www.battlestargames.com The Best Free Games On The Internet
So what we are always looking for is energy sources that take a long
time to deplete or are vastly available as for example hydrogen which
can be easily extracted from water and much faster propulsion system
Nuclear power promised to be the technology of the future because of the
extreme energy output. One nuclear power plant is said to generate as
much energy per day as 50.000 wind power stations. The radioactive waste
that is produced was simply ignored as a problem and claims were maid
that we would be able to recycle radioactive waste and turn it into non
dangerous substance within the next 15 years. That didn't sound bad at
all, but commercial nuclear power plants have been built since the
1950's and now over 60 years later absolutely no progress has been made
in solving the radioactive waste problems.
www.XFloozy.com The Best Free Hardcore Porn that's legal.
Today everyone knows about this deadly garbage we produce every single
day but we seem not to be aware of what's happening with it. Huge
nations Like the U.S.A. , Russia, Germany, China, Japan and so on simply
buy the rights to dump their waste in third world countries. Wait,
what? Take a sandbox and start dropping paint or dye in one corner. Just
a drop a day and after a while the entire sandbox is going to be
colored. Whats the difference to dropping nuclear waste in third world
countries?
The persons in charge of dumping this waste have come up with the idea
to simply seal the waste in boxes made of different metals but since
they believe that the languages we speak may become extinct before this
waste becomes safe again, they have painted warning signs depicting
people wearing masks or otherwise dying in agony under the influence of
radioactive poisoning. Seems like we need to put a lot more effort in
making clean nuclear waste before we build more plants.
Back to the transport question the ion propulsion system seems very promising.
Rocket engines generally work by pushing propellant away from the craft.
This pushes the craft in the opposite direction. It's just like what
causes a balloon to rush around as the air is allowed to escape. In
effect the air pushes the balloon as it leaves.
Ion engines use the same principle, only much more efficient. Xenon
(which is a gas like helium or neon, but heavier) flows into the ion
engine, where it is given an electrical charge.
Charged atoms are called ions. xenon ions, can be pushed around by an
electrical voltage. A pair of grids in the ion engine, electrified to
almost 1300 volts, accelerates the ions to very high speed and basically
shoots them out of the engine. As the ions fly away from the engine,
they push the spacecraft, propelling it in the opposite direction.
Possible ways to ionize xenon in space are either the already in use
solar energy systems or as on “project prometheus” a small nuclear
reactor. The problem with the nuclear reactor is of course still that
the craft is essentially filled with extremely harmful material.
Xenon ions travel at about 35 kilometers/second or 77,000 miles/hour.
That's about 10 times the speed of the exhaust from conventional rocket
engines. This means ion engines would be at least 10 times faster than
the rockets we have today. It also means that it takes only one tenth as
much “fuel” for an ion engine to work as it does for a chemical
propulsion system. On order to launch successful missions outside of our
solar-system we need to use fuel and propulsion systems that are much
more efficient .
www.ionintel.com Check Out Free Online Browser Games
The ion engines use only a very small amount of xenon at a time which
means that the thrust is extremely low. If you put a sheet of paper on
your hand, the paper pushes on your hand about as hard as the ion engine
pushes on the spacecraft! It can take 4 days or even more just to
deplete 1 kilogram / about 2 pounds of xenon. In effect ion engines can
be operated for years. The effect of the gentle thrust slowly builds up,
and eventually generates speeds far beyond the reach of conventional
propellants.
Deep Space 1, using less than 74 kg (163 pounds) of xenon, accelerated
by about 4.3 kilometers/second (9600 miles/hour) and mission control
didn't even decide to try the engines full potential because there were
other objectives to achieve at the moment.
In theory by tuning the engine to use a variety elements it may be
possible to collect fuel inflight thus creating a Spacecraft that
doesn't require refueling once launched in space. The future of
propulsion seems very promising and we can look forward to completely
new ways of space travel. - www.paxeye.com
No comments:
Post a Comment